Net Neutrality

Net Neutrality is like having a free world of speech and common interest on the internet. http://isen.com/blog/2006/06/welcome-to-stupid-internet.html
The first  Article states that Net Neutrality is where someone decided that a stupid internet is better than a smart internet. I do not feel likewise with this statement.  Net neutrality is being able to share and open the horizon for information on the internet. Who ever said that one site would be better than another? Who ever said that Disney.com was better than Nick.com or the Versatile? I believe with Net Neutrality it allows the people to decide what they want to see or hear, from who they would like to see or hear it by. Without Net neutrality people would not have a voice on the internet. Just because one celebrity says that the ocean is blue does not mean someone who says the ocean is clear is wrong. The fact that Net Neutrality allows every one to feel free to speak and have just as much of a chance to express their opinion is a good thing. Now in this article they talk about prioritizing certain bits and site. Though that may be a great idea, it could take away from the randomization of information that people could consume. Yes the internet with be more organized, but at the same time it would become basis. Giving more promotion to one site would only make people look at the first thing they saw instead of looking for more of the opposed opinion or display. If we did not use Net Neutrality how else would we know about new technology or new media, or news. In my opinion every one that post a site or any sort of information should be given the same opportunity as the bigger corporations.